propfirmtrading

Original research · updated September 2026

Prop firm challenge statistics

Every figure on this page is computed from the PropFirmTrading database of 31 prop firms and 616 purchasable challenges, plus 9,822 public trader reviews aggregated across 30 firms. The figures contain no estimates and no survey panels. Journalists and creators may cite any figure with a link to this page.

New: the quarterly report records these numbers in a stable edition that can be cited.

State of Prop Trading - Q3 2026
The five terms this page uses
Challenge / evaluation:
a paid test. A trader who passes receives a funded account to trade, and the profits are shared with the firm.
Drawdown:
the loss limit on an account. A trader who loses more than this limit fails. A static limit stays fixed, and a trailing limit moves up as the trader profits, which is stricter.
Profit target:
the amount a trader must make to pass the evaluation.
Consistency rule:
a cap on how much of the total profit may come from one day. The rule requires steady gains instead of one large trade.
Profit split:
the share of funded-account profit that the trader keeps, for example 90% to the trader.
616Challenges tracked615 with live, discount-applied pricing
49%No consistency ruleNo cap on how much of the profit may come from a single day
33.3%Trailing drawdownsA loss limit that moves up as the trader profits, which is stricter than a fixed one. Of 600 challenges with a documented type
28%Average verified discountMean saving on challenges where a verified code is below the list price

What a $100K account costs

Account size is nominal, so the averages need one caveat. A $100K futures account typically carries a third of the drawdown room of a $100K CFD account. The price gap below therefore favours futures, and the drawdown-adjusted version follows in the next section.

CFD · 66 programs

$444 avg

Cheapest: The5ers Bootcamp at $95

Futures · 38 programs

$195 avg

Cheapest: Top One Futures Elite Access at $39

Crypto · 9 programs

$422 avg

Cheapest: For Traders Crypto Fast Pro 1-Step at $145

What $1,000 of drawdown room costs

Drawdown room is the amount a trader may lose before the firm fails the account. The fee buys this allowed loss, not the headline account size. Two $100K accounts can differ threefold on drawdown room, so this section prices each challenge per dollar of allowed loss. Priced this way, the futures price advantage disappears and CFD challenges offer the cheapest room in the industry.

$55CFD - per $1K of roomAvg $411 buys ~$7,431 of drawdown · 65 challenges
$64Futures - per $1K of roomAvg $195 buys ~$3,026 of drawdown · 38 challenges
$73Crypto - per $1K of roomAvg $457 buys ~$6,250 of drawdown · 8 challenges

Cheapest funded capital by firm

This table shows what $1,000 of simulated capital costs at each firm, with verified discount codes already applied. Cost per $1,000 is a fair way to compare a $25 challenge against a $500 one. The last column shows the maximum drawdown, because cheap capital usually comes with a thin loss allowance.

Firm / ProgramSizePrice$ per $1KMax DD
Traders Launch NYC 55%200K$74$0.370.5%

How the rulebooks split

51.5%Static drawdownsA fixed loss floor that never moves, which is the most lenient kind. Compared with 15.2% end-of-day and 33.3% trailing
13%No daily loss limitA single losing day cannot fail the account on its own. Only the overall loss limit applies
24.4%Instant fundingNo evaluation phase. The account is funded from day one, at a higher fee per dollar of room
63.3%90%+ profit splitsThe trader keeps 90%+ of the profit, and 22.2% offer a 100% tier. A split depends on the payout process behind it, which the reviews cover

Drawdown room vs profit target, by market

The PT:DD ratio shows how many dollars a trader may lose for every dollar of profit target. A ratio of 1:0.65 means 65 cents of allowed loss per dollar of target. A higher ratio is more forgiving, and above 1:1 the trader has more room to lose than the amount that must be earned.

1:0.66CFD averageAcross 310 challenges with published targets and limits
1:0.58Futures averageAcross 101 challenges with published targets and limits
1:0.56Crypto averageAcross 38 challenges with published targets and limits

What 9,822 trader reviews say

4.35Weighted average ratingAcross all 30 firms with public review bases
7.5%One-star shareMost one-star reviews concern payout-stage disputes, which the review pages cover
14/30Firms rated 4.5+The rating level that the top firms reach
31Full review analysesThe review base of every firm has been read and summarised, including one-star reports

Cite this data

The quarterly edition is the stable reference, because its figures are frozen and never change under the URL. A current number on this page can be cited by linking its section directly. Every stat block has its own anchor, for example /research#no-consistency-rule.

PropFirmTrading, "State of Prop Trading - Q3 2026," propfirmtrading.net/research/state-of-prop-trading-q3-2026. Licensed CC BY 4.0.

The full statistics can be downloaded under CC BY 4.0. They may be reused in articles, videos or independent analysis with attribution and a link.

Embed these stats

Each stat card below is an image that updates with the database and carries its own attribution. Copy the snippet and paste it into an article, newsletter, HTML page or CMS.

Average $100K prop firm challenge price by market
What $1,000 of drawdown room costs by market, risk-adjusted challenge pricing
Share of prop firm challenges with no consistency rule
Cheapest funded trading capital per $1,000 of buying power
Average drawdown-to-profit-target ratio by market

Methodology

Challenge data comes from each firm's published pricing and rulebooks. The database is refreshed by automated scrapes and by manual verification after firm announcements, and prices reflect verified discount codes. Review figures aggregate publicly posted trader reviews on independent platforms, captured July 2026. Averages are simple means unless marked weighted. Drawdown-type and rule shares use only challenges where the firm documents the attribute. All figures regenerate with every site deploy.

Custom cuts of the data, such as a specific market, size tier or rule, are available to journalists and creators on request through the contact page.