Compare
CFD firms, side by side
This tool compares up to 4 CFD firms on price, capital, rules and payouts. The list follows the market switch above.
The short version
- Cheapest 2-step at 100K
- The5ers Summer 2-Step 10/5 $126.65 (FundingPips 2-Step Pro $316.50)
- More drawdown room
- The5ers 0.67 per 1 of target
- First challenge
- The5ers
- Scaling up
- The5ers
- Swing trader
- The5ers
The rulebook that matches the trader’s style should decide.
The figures compare FundingPips 2-Step Pro and The5ers Summer 2-Step 10/5 at 100K, the cheapest 2-step program each firm sells at that size.
cTrader
MT5
cTrader
MT5
Mastercard
Riseworks
Visa Direct
RiseworksWhere FundingPips and The5ers differ
Price at 100K
The5ers $126.65 · Summer 2-Step 10/5
FundingPips $316.50 · 2-Step Pro
$190 between cheapest and dearest, per attempt
Profit split
FundingPips up to 80%
The5ers up to 80%
Same split on these programs
Maximum loss
The5ers 10%, Static
FundingPips 6%, Static
Wider buffer, more room for a losing run; static beats trailing
Drawdown per 1 of target
The5ers 0.67
FundingPips 0.50
Higher means the target is small next to the room to fail
Daily loss limit
FundingPips 3%
The5ers 3%
Ends more accounts than the maximum drawdown does
Total profit target
FundingPips 12% in 2 phases
The5ers 15% in 2 phases
Lower total, shorter evaluation
Trustpilot
The5ers 4.7
FundingPips 4.5
The review pages explain what sits behind each score
Which firm fits which trader
A reading of the data for three common situations. The rulebook that fits the trader's style matters more than any single figure.
A first challenge on a small budget
New to prop firms and paying to learn a rulebook at the lowest cost.
The data favours
The5ers
- The entry ticket is $19 at The5ers against $21.75 at FundingPips.
- Its cheapest program also allows 0.77 of drawdown per 1 of target, so a learner has more room.
- No consistency rule applies on that program, which removes one common cause of a failed first account.
A consistent trader scaling up
Has passed evaluations before and cares about the share of profit kept and the ceiling on funding.
The data favours
The5ers
- The largest account is $250K at The5ers, so a consistent trader has further to scale.
A swing trader holding for days
Uses wider stops and needs room for positions to move against the entry before they work.
The data favours
The5ers
- At 100K, The5ers allows 0.67 of drawdown per 1 of profit target and FundingPips allows 0.50.
- The drawdown is static, so open profit does not raise the floor while a position runs.
Questions traders ask about FundingPips and The5ers
What does a 100K challenge cost at FundingPips and The5ers?
FundingPips 2-Step Pro 100K costs $316.50 with code PROPFT (list price $422). The5ers Summer 2-Step 10/5 100K costs $126.65 with code PROPFT (list price $149). Prices are checked daily and may change.
Which pays the higher profit split, FundingPips or The5ers?
Both pay up to 80% on the programs compared here. The full split text for each program is on the firm profiles.
Which firm allows more drawdown at 100K?
FundingPips allows 6% ($6,000), Static and The5ers allows 10% ($10,000), Static. The daily loss limit is 3% ($3,000) at FundingPips and 3% ($3,000) at The5ers.
Do FundingPips and The5ers allow news trading?
FundingPips: Holding or opening trades 10 minutes before and 10 minutes after high-impact news events and speeches on the affected currency is strictly prohibited | Hard… The5ers: High Stakes & Summer Plan: no executing orders from 2 min before until 2 min after high-impact news
How often do FundingPips and The5ers pay out?
FundingPips: Not listed The5ers: Bi-weekly Summer Plan payout caps: $2,000 per payout cycle (100K) | $3,000 (200K) Summer 1-Step funded target: 10% (same as the evaluation)
Which firm suits a first prop firm challenge, FundingPips or The5ers?
On price and drawdown room the data favours The5ers. The entry ticket is $19 at The5ers against $21.75 at FundingPips. Its cheapest program also allows 0.77 of drawdown per 1 of target, so a learner has more room. No consistency rule applies on that program, which removes one common cause of a failed first account. Both firms are viable, and the rulebook that fits the trader's style matters more than the cheaper ticket.